Rob Jackson: Paying our debt to the air
The costs of air pollution aren't going away, a Duke professor says
Tuesday, March 11, 2003
When he turned 70 my grandfather quit paying taxes. There is
something amusing in the image of an old man thumbing his nose at
the government. Not paying was an act of rebellion, but he also
just didn't like keeping records.
I asked him once why he did it. "I don't know,"
he replied. "First it was only a few days, then a week, and before
I knew it months and years had gone by. It was easy. Deep down
inside, though, I knew better."
Recently those words kept coming back to me. I wondered why, and
now I think I've figured out the answer.
They're the perfect metaphor for our relationship to the
environment. Deep down inside, we know better.
The environment is like a car. Maintain it properly and it
serves you well for a long time. Abuse it and it'll cost you.
Once I had a roommate who couldn't be bothered changing the oil
in his car or even checking it very often. Beer money was more
important. (And as his roommate, I certainly agreed.) He
rationalized his choice by saying, "What are the chances that the
car will break on the very next trip? Really small, right? Small
chances don't happen very often."
Eventually, one perfectly normal day, he got in his car, rolled
snake eyes, and his engine burned up. His parents, who had helped
him buy the car, didn't view the money he'd "saved" in quite the
same way. Deep down inside I think he knew better.
We should, too, when it comes to environmental problems like
global warming. Physicist Jean Baptiste Fourier first described how
greenhouse gases warm our planet in 1827. In the 1890s Svante
Arrhenius and P.C. Chamberlain both outlined how a buildup of
carbon dioxide from burning fossils would warm the Earth.
Two hundred years later we still pretend that such ideas are
"new" or "uncertain," that we really don't understand the Earth
well enough to act. We also pretend it's too expensive to act, just
like my roommate did. Deep down inside I think we know
better.
Fixing environmental problems can take lifetimes. When carbon
dioxide reaches our air, it typically takes a century or more to
disappear, and there is little we can do about it. Global warming
will thus continue for decades, even centuries, after we eliminate
the pollution causing it. Our grandchildren deserve better.
Companies like BP Amoco and Royal Dutch Shell have already
stated that we should act. The question is how.
Last year California became the first state to pass its own
greenhouse gas plan. Controversial bill AB 1493 sets emission
targets for vehicles made after 2008, factoring in cost and
technical feasibility. Why is California doing it? For future
generations and for people today -- lower emissions mean lower
pollution right now. We should be discussing whether a similar bill
makes sense in North Carolina.
Increasing fuel efficiency is another obvious goal. Hybrid cars
routinely get 50 miles to the gallon and never need to be plugged
in. Why aren't we acting? By ignoring fuel efficiency and the Kyoto
Protocol, we play right into the hands of countries who claim that
war in Iraq is all about oil.
Finally, we need a broad-based carbon tax to give people and
companies incentives to conserve. The tax should be
revenue-neutral, a dollar out for every dollar in. I have no desire
to give the government billions of dollars, and neither did my
grandfather.
Ultimately, of course, he paid. It took the government more than
a decade to catch him. When they did, he paid the original bill. He
paid interest. He paid penalties, liens and fees. He paid in
spades.
Perhaps what hurt him most, though, was that his children paid
too. My uncle spent months trying to reconstruct his financial
records. How ironic that my grandfather's stubborn independence
ultimately made him depend completely on his children to fix the
problem.
Deep down inside he knew better. So should we. If we keep
pretending that the bill will never come due, our children will be
the ones picking up the tab.
This article originally appeared in the March 8 News and
Observer



