Inside a Damaged Nerve Cell
Two genes can start spinal cord regeneration
Friday, January 5, 2001
In an accompanying News & Views article in the journal,
Clifford Woolf of Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard
Medical School called the finding "a major advance in the
understanding of which molecules are required to induce injured
axons to grow over long distances."
"This was a very happy surprise," Skene said. "We had not made such
an experiment a priority because it seemed hard to believe that
expressing only one or two genes could have such a significant
impact on neuronal regeneration. The number could have been closer
to 50 or a hundred. Fortunately, however, we decided it was time to
find out the effect of expressing the important genes we already
understood."
Other co-authors on the paper are Duke researchers Howard Bomze,
Ketan Bulsara and Bermans Iskandar and Pico Caroni of the Friedrich
Miescher Institute in Basel, Switzerland.
Their research was supported by the National Institutes of Health,
Novartis Pharmaceuticals and the Christopher Reeve Paralysis
Foundation.
The two proteins, GAP-43 and CAP-23, are known to reside in the
growing tip of the axon, known as the growth cone. The proteins
appear to play a poorly understood role in integrating and
modulating biochemical signals in the growing axon. It also had
long been known that the genes for such proteins were switched on
during development to foster growth of axons in the brain and
spinal cord, but that they were turned off in adults. The genes for
GAP-43 and CAP-23 were known to be re-activated after damage to
peripheral nerves, which regenerate effectively, but not after
spinal cord injury. Neuroscientists had debated whether activation
of these genes is needed for regeneration of spinal cord axons, and
which of the many genes induced by peripheral nerve injury are
critical for regrowth, said Skene.
"Although we had known for some time that GAP-43 and CAP-23 are not
ordinarily expressed after spinal cord injury, it was not clear
what role that lack of expression played in preventing axon
regeneration," he said. "This paper offers the best evidence so far
that expression of these genes is one of the key factors
determining the success or failure of regeneration."
In their experiments, Skene and his colleagues used cultures of
dorsal root ganglion (DRG) nerve cells taken from adult mice. The
axons of DRG neurons carry sensory information from the body up the
spinal cord to the brain and form one of the principal fiber tracts
damaged by spinal cord injuries. But, because the cell bodies of
these neurons are located just outside the spinal cord, they are
more easily isolated for cell culture than other adult neurons,
Skene said.
"This in vitro system has two major advantages," he explained.
"First, it is much faster and more straightforward than doing a
complete study in intact animals, which can take years. So, we can
study many genes and combinations that appear likely to support
regenerative axon growth. And secondly, we can study the whole cell
in isolation and in a well-controlled environment. By contrast,
attempting to trace axon growth in the intact animal is more
difficult."
Using this in vitro assay, Bomze studied the response to axon
injury of DRG neurons taken from mice that had been engineered to
express genes for GAP-43 or CAP-23, or both.
"He found that cells expressing the genes for either GAP-43 or
CAP-23 alone produced cell growth, but of the highly branched type
characteristic of local remodeling," Skene said. "But when cells
expressed the genes for both proteins, they switched to a long,
unbranched axon growth that resembles nerve regeneration," he said.
"We were very impressed that the combination of these two genes
produced a qualitatively different kind of growth than either gene
alone."
The scientists next sought to detect whether the combination of
genes produced the same growth affect in adult mice. They produced
spinal cord lesions in both normal wild-type mice and transgenic
mice engineered to produce both proteins as adults. To give any
potentially regenerating axons a support on which to grow, the
scientists grafted a segment of peripheral nerve into the spinal
cord lesion site.
After several weeks, they used a fluorescent axon tracer to label
any spinal cord axons that had been able to regenerate. These
staining measurements revealed that the transgenic mice were 60
times as likely to regenerate their spinal cord axons as the
wild-type mice.
According to Skene, further research will include using the in
vitro assay to explore the effects of introducing growth-inducing
genes after an injury.
"In these experiments, we used transgenic animals that expressed
the genes throughout life, whereas normally they turn off after the
spinal cord is completed," Skene said. "But that's not what happens
in a person who has an accident that severs the spinal cord. So, we
need to understand the effects of expressing these genes in adults
- after an injury has occurred - and for how long they need to be
expressed to get an effect. Also, we need to develop techniques for
inserting these genes into neurons after an injury."
